Comparación de la calidad de vida en personas que viven con infección por VIH en seguimiento mediante atención farmacéutica según metodología capacidad motivación-oportunidad vs. seguimiento convencional. Proyecto MAS-VIH / Comparison of quality of life in patients living with HIV infection through pharmaceutical care according to CMO methodology vs. conventional follow-up. MAS-VIH project

Objetivo. Comparar la calidad de vida en personas que viven con infección por el Virus de la Inmunodeficiencia Humana según el modelo de Atención Farmacéutica que reciben en los Servicios de Farmacia Hospitalaria: CMO (capacidad, motivación y oportunidad), versus seguimiento convencional. Método. Estudio longitudinal, prospectivo, multicéntrico, realizado entre octubre-2019 y noviembre-2021 en 14 Servicios de Farmacia Hospitalaria de España. Se incluyeron pacientes mayores de 18 años, que recibían tratamiento antirretroviral y acudían a las consultas de Atención Farmacéutica durante ≥1 año. Se excluyeron aquellos pacientes sin autonomía para completar los cuestionarios previstos. Los centros fueron aleatorizados a seguir utilizando la misma sistemática de trabajo (seguimiento tradicional) o implementar el modelo CMO, utilizando la estratificación, establecimiento de objetivos farmacoterapéuticos, uso de entrevista motivacional, así como el seguimientolongitudinal con nuevas tecnologías. La variable principal fue la diferencia en el número de dimensiones afectadas negativamente, en cada rama, a las 24 semanas, según cuestionario MOS-HIV. En el brazo CMO se registraron las intervenciones más frecuentemente realizadas.Resultados. Se incluyeron 151 pacientes. La mediana de edad fue de 51,3 años. Se encontró mejora significativa de la calidad de vida al final del seguimiento en el grupo CMO, reduciéndose el número de pacientes con dimensiones afectadas negativamente (2/11 vs 8/11). Las intervenciones más frecuentes llevadas a cabo, según la taxonomía, fueron: Motivación (51,7%) y Revisión y validación del TAR (49,4%). Conclusiones. La calidad de vida de los pacientes es superior en aquellos centros que desarrollan Atención Farmacéutica basada en metodología CMO en comparación con el seguimiento tradicional. (AU)

Objective. To compare quality of life, in patients livingwith HIV infection with pharmaceutical care according to the CMO methodology: capacity, motivation and opportunity versus conventional follow-up. Method. Longitudinal, prospective, multicenter, health intervention study, conducted between October 2019 and November 2021 in 14 centers throughout Spain. Patients over 18 years of age, receiving antiretroviral treatment and attending the consultations of the participating Pharmacy Services for 1 year were included. Patients who did not have the autonomy to complete the planned questionnaires were excluded. At baseline, participating centers were randomized to continue using the same systematics of work (traditional follow-up) or to implement the CMO model using patient stratification models, goal setting in relation to pharmacotherapy, use of motivational interviewing, as well as longitudinal follow-up enabled by new technologies. The main variable was the difference in the number of dimensions positively affected in each follow-up arm at 24 weeks of follow-up according to the MOS-HIV questionnaire. In the CMO group, the interventions performed the most frequently were recorded. Results. 151 patients were included. The median age was 51.35 years. A significant improvement in quality of life was found at the end of follow-up in the CMO group, reducing the number of patients with negatively affected dimensions (2/11 vs 8/11). The most frequent interventions carried out in the CMO group, according to the taxonomy, were Motivation (51,7%) and review and validation (49,4%) Conclusions. The quality of life of patients is higher in those centers that develop Pharmaceutical Care based on the CMO methodology compared to traditional follow-up. (AU)

Telematic interview in telepharmacy: consensus document for farmacotherapeutic monitoring and informed drug delivery.

Telepharmacy is defined as the practice of remote pharmaceutical care, using information and communication technologies. Given its growing importance in outpatient pharmaceutical care, the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy developed a consensus document, "Guía de entrevista telemática en atención farmacéutica," as part of its strategy for the development and expansion of telepharmacy, with key recommendations for effective pharmacotherapeutic monitoring and informed dispensing and delivery of medications through telematic interviews. The document was developed by a working group of hospital pharmacists with experience in the field. It highlights the benefits of telematic interviewing for patients, hospital pharmacy professionals, and the healthcare system as a whole, reviews the various tools for conducting telematic interviews, and provides recommendations for each phase of the interview. These recommendations cover aspects such as tool/platform selection, patient selection, obtaining authorization and consent, assessing technological skills, defining objectives and structure, scheduling appointments, reviewing medical records, and ensuring humane treatment. Telematic interview is a valuable complement to face-to-face consultations but its novelty requires a strategic and formal framework that this consensus document aims to cover. The use of appropriate communication tools and compliance with recommended procedures ensure patient safety and satisfaction. By implementing telematic interviews, healthcare institutions can improve patient care, optimize the use of resources and promote continuity of care.

Perceived quality of life in patients with psoriasis treated with interleukin 17 and 23 inhibitors. / Calidad de vida percibida por los pacientes con psoriasis tratados con inhibidores de interleucina 17 y 23.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness in terms of quality of life perceived by adult patients with moderate/severe plaque psoriasis treated with interleukin 17 or 23 inhibitors and to identify associated factors. METHOD: Cross-sectional observational study including adult patients diagnosed with moderate/severe plaque psoriasis treated with interleukin 17 or 23 inhibitors for at least 12 or 16 weeks in follow-up, respectively. RESULTS: Forty-one patients were included: 65% male, median age 54 years (SD=13). The included patients were treated with ixekizumab 35%, guselkumab 25%, secukinumab 17.5%, brodalumab 15% and risankizumab 7.5%. Psoariasis area severity index (PASI) reduction was 94.6% (RIC 76.8-100%), DLQI of 1 (RIC 0-2.75), DLQI ≤ 1, 60%. The most affected health dimensions were symptoms and perceptions (57.5%), activities of daily living (27.5%) and discomfort caused with treatment (17.5%). No association was found between DLQI score < 1 and demographic, comorbidities and treatment-related variables. The median PASI reduction in patients with DLQI<1 was superior to patients with DLQI > 1 (100% vs 90.2%, p=0.025). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with moderate/severe plaque psoriasis treated with interleukin 17 or 23 inhibitors achieve adequate therapeutic targets achieving the target set according to clinical practice guideline recommendations (score ≤1 on the DLQI questionnaire and 90-100% reduction in the PASI index) and in accordance with the results of recent meta-analyses and real-life studies. A greater reduction of the PASI index is observed in the group reaching the quality of life target, there being the possibility of using patient-reported outcomes in the evaluation of treatment effectiveness.

The Telepharmacy patient prioritisation model of the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy.

The Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy Position Paper on Telepharmacy states that the inclusion of patients should take into account  ethical considerations and, therefore, be based on the concept of equity. Thus, it establishes that Telepharmacy should not be limited to specific  pathologies or medicines, but should be based on the individual needs of each patient: it also highlights the need to rely on selection or prioritisation models to help identify patients who can benefit from  Telepharmacy. The aim of this article is to present the Spanish Society of  Hospital Pharmacy Telepharmacy Patient Prioritisation Model, which establishes  key recommendations and a reference prioritisation model to guide  hospital pharmacists in the identification and prioritisation of patients  who are candidates for inclusion in Telepharmacy programmes. This model was  developed based on the experience of a group of experts in their clinical  practice as well as on a review of the main reference documents available in  this field. It comprises 25 criteria, grouped into 8 minimum inclusion criteria, 5 continuity criteria, and 12 recommended criteria. The latter criteria are divided  into high, medium, and low priority criteria. Patients are prioritised according  to their scores on meeting the recommended criteria, such that those with the  highest scores are given the highest priority. As stated in the Spanish Society  of Hospital Pharmacy Position Paper on Telepharmacy, pharmacotherapeutic  monitoring can be conducted via remote consultation without sending  medication, but not vice versa; thus, the 25 criteria defined apply to  Telepharmacy programmes in the area of the remote dispensing and informed  delivery of medicines, but only 19 of them apply to pharmacotherapeutic  monitoring programmes. The model presented is intended to be a reference  guide and should be adapted to the particular characteristics and  circumstances of each pharmacy service, depending on demand and available  resources.

La Sociedad Española de Farmacia Hospitalaria, en su Documento de  osicionamiento sobre Telefarmacia, establece que la inclusión de pacientes debe tener en cuenta consideraciones éticas y, por tanto, estar  basada en el concepto de equidad. Por ello, establece que la Telefarmacia no  debe restringirse por patologías ni medicamentos, sino en función de las  necesidades individuales de cada paciente, y destaca la necesidad de apoyarse en modelos de selección o priorización que ayuden en la  identificación de los pacientes que puedan beneficiarse de la Telefarmacia. El  objetivo de este artículo es presentar el "Modelo de priorización de pacientes  en Telefarmacia de la Sociedad Española de Farmacia Hospitalaria", que pretende establecer recomendaciones clave y un modelo de priorización de referencia que sirva de orientación a los farmacéuticos especialistas en farmacia hospitalaria para la identificación y priorización de pacientes candidatos a ser incluidos en programas de Telefarmacia. El modelo  a sido desarrollado en base a la experiencia de un grupo de expertos en su práctica clínica y a la revisión de los principales documentos de referencia disponibles en este ámbito y está conformado por un total de 25  criterios, agrupados en 8 criterios mínimos de inclusión, 5 criterios de  continuidad y 12 criterios recomendables. Estos últimos se dividen en criterios  de alta, media y baja prioridad. En función de las puntuaciones obtenidas del  cumplimiento de los criterios recomendables, se establece el orden de  prioridad de pacientes, de modo que aquellos que mayor puntuación obtengan  serán los más prioritarios. Tal como recoge el "Documento de Posicionamiento sobre Telefarmacia de la Sociedad Española de Farmacia Hospitalaria", puede  haber seguimiento farmacoterapéutico por teleconsulta sin envío de medicación, pero no al contrario, por lo que los 25 criterios definidos aplican a  programas de Telefarmacia en el ámbito de la dispensación y entrega informada de medicamentos a distancia, pero solamente 19 de ellos aplican para los programas de seguimiento farmacoterapéutico. El modelo que se  presenta ha sido concebido como un marco de referencia y deberá adaptarse a las características y circunstancias particulares de cada servicio de farmacia,  en función de la demanda y de los recursos disponibles.

Modelo de priorización de pacientes en Telefarmacia de la Sociedad Española de Farmacia Hospitalaria / The Telepharmacy patient prioritisation model of the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy

La Sociedad Española de Farmacia Hospitalaria, en su Documento de Posicionamiento sobre Telefarmacia, establece que la inclusión de pacientesdebe tener en cuenta consideraciones éticas y, por tanto, estar basada enel concepto de equidad. Por ello, establece que la Telefarmacia no deberestringirse por patologías ni medicamentos, sino en función de las necesidades individuales de cada paciente, y destaca la necesidad de apoyarseen modelos de selección o priorización que ayuden en la identificaciónde los pacientes que puedan beneficiarse de la Telefarmacia. El objetivode este artículo es presentar el “Modelo de priorización de pacientes enTelefarmacia de la Sociedad Española de Farmacia Hospitalaria”, quepretende establecer recomendaciones clave y un modelo de priorizaciónde referencia que sirva de orientación a los farmacéuticos especialistas enfarmacia hospitalaria para la identificación y priorización de pacientescandidatos a ser incluidos en programas de Telefarmacia. El modelo hasido desarrollado en base a la experiencia de un grupo de expertos en supráctica clínica y a la revisión de los principales documentos de referenciadisponibles en este ámbito y está conformado por un total de 25 criterios,agrupados en 8 criterios mínimos de inclusión, 5 criterios de continuidad y 12 criterios recomendables. Estos últimos se dividen en criterios de alta,media y baja prioridad. En función de las puntuaciones obtenidas del cumplimiento de los criterios recomendables, se establece el orden de prioridadde pacientes, de modo que aquellos que mayor puntuación obtengan seránlos más prioritarios. (AU)

The Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy Position Paper on Telepharmacy states that the inclusion of patients should take into account ethicalconsiderations and, therefore, be based on the concept of equity. Thus,it establishes that Telepharmacy should not be limited to specific pathologies or medicines, but should be based on the individual needs of eachpatient: it also highlights the need to rely on selection or prioritisationmodels to help identify patients who can benefit from Telepharmacy. Theaim of this article is to present the Spanish Society of Hospital PharmacyTelepharmacy Patient Prioritisation Model, which establishes key recommendations and a reference prioritisation model to guide hospital pharmacists in the identification and prioritisation of patients who are candidatesfor inclusion in Telepharmacy programmes. This model was developedbased on the experience of a group of experts in their clinical practiceas well as on a review of the main reference documents available in thisfield. It comprises 25 criteria, grouped into 8 minimum inclusion criteria,5 continuity criteria, and 12 recommended criteria. The latter criteria aredivided into high, medium, and low priority criteria. Patients are prioritisedaccording to their scores on meeting the recommended criteria, such that those with the highest scores are given the highest priority. (AU)

Patient Experience Evaluation of the CMO-Based Pharmaceutical Care Model vs Usual Care in People Living with HIV.

Objective: To compare patient experience in a real-life population of people living with HIV (PLWH) who received pharmaceutical care (PC) based on the Capacity-Motivation-Opportunity (CMO) model versus the traditional model. Methods: Prospective cohort study in PLWH receiving either CMO-based PC or traditional PC in Spain between October 2019 and June 2021 (24 weeks), performed by the pharmacy department of 14 Spanish hospitals. Participants were adult patients with a clinical diagnosis of HIV treated with antiretrovirals who had been monitored in the participating hospital pharmacies for >1 year. Patient experience (IEXPAC questionnaire), clinical outcomes (cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL, glycated haemoglobin, and blood pressure), adherence to treatment, virologic control and patient satisfaction were determined. Results: Patient experience in the CMO group at week 24 was significantly better (7.6 vs 6.9) than in the traditional group, with a higher mean improvement. Adherence was better in the CMO group, particularly with regard to concomitant medications (53.2% to 91.7%, p<0.001); no changes were observed in the traditional group. Patient satisfaction improved in the CMO group vs the traditional group (48 vs 44, p<0.001). Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first study to compare CMO vs traditional methodology. The CMO model showed an overall improvement in real-life patient experience, satisfaction, and adherence to treatment compared to the traditional methodology.

Adherencia al tratamiento con somatotropina administrada con dispositivo electrónico / Adherence to somatotropin treatment administered with an electronic device

Introducción: La adherencia al tratamiento con somatotropina se relaciona con el aumento de la velocidad de crecimiento y la mejora de la talla adulta. El objeto de este estudio es conocer la adherencia de pacientes en tratamiento con dispositivo electrónico y determinar la relación con diferentes variables (edad, sexo, duración del tratamiento, diagnóstico, talla y velocidad de crecimiento). Material y métodos: Estudio descriptivo, longitudinal y retrospectivo de menores de 14 años de la consulta de Endocrinología Pediátrica del Hospital General Universitario de Ciudad Real, en tratamiento con somatotropina administrada con el dispositivo electrónico Easypod(R). Se realiza seguimiento de la adherencia durante 12 meses. Se define adherencia según la fórmula: (días administrados a la dosis prescrita/días prescritos)×100. El análisis de los datos se realizó con el software SPSS. Resultados: Se recogió a 30 pacientes: predominio varones (57%), edad media 6,09 años, menores de 5 años el 51%. Las causas más frecuentes de tratamiento: pequeño para la edad gestacional (55%) y déficit de hormona de crecimiento (38%). Tiempo medio de tratamiento 4,3 años (3,6-5). Se evidenció una adherencia media del 92,3% (87,7-96,9), observándose una correlación significativa con la edad (R de Pearson = -0,384; p = 0,03) y la duración del tratamiento (R de Pearson = -0,537; p = 0,003). Conclusiones: La adherencia en nuestros pacientes con dispositivo electrónico es alta (92,3%), relacionándose inversamente con la edad y la duración del tratamiento. El uso de dispositivos electrónicos permite un seguimiento del cumplimiento terapéutico, lo que repercute en la optimización del tratamiento

Introduction: Adherence to somatotropin treatment is associated with increased growth velocity and improved adult height. The purpose of this study is to determine the adherence of patients undergoing treatment with an electronic device and its relationship with different variables (age, gender, duration of treatment, diagnosis, height, and growth rate). Material and methods: Descriptive, longitudinal and retrospective study of children less than 14 years of age undergoing treatment with somatotropin administered with the Easypod(R) electronic device in the Paediatric Endocrinology Outpatient Clinic of the General University Hospital of Ciudad Real, Spain. Adherence was monitored for 12 months and was defined according to the equation: (days administered at the prescribed dose / prescribed days)×100. The data analysis was performed using SPSS software. Results: Data were collected from 30 patients, with a predominance of males (57%), a mean age of 6.09 years, with 51% of children less than 5 years old. The most common reasons for the treatment were: small for gestational age (55%) and growth hormone deficiency (38%). The mean duration of treatment was 4.3 years (3.6-5). A mean adherence of 92.3% (87.7-96.9) was observed, and there was a significant correlation with age (Pearson R = -0.384, P=.03), and duration of treatment (Pearson R = -0.537; P=.003). Conclusions: The adherence in our patients with electronic device is high (92.3%), and is inversely associated with age and duration. The use of electronic devices allows monitoring of therapeutic compliance, which affects the optimisation of treatment

Adherence to somatotropin treatment administered with an electronic device. / Adherencia al tratamiento con somatotropina administrada con dispositivo electrónico.

INTRODUCTION: Adherence to somatotropin treatment is associated with increased growth velocity and improved adult height. The purpose of this study is to determine the adherence of patients undergoing treatment with an electronic device and its relationship with different variables (age, gender, duration of treatment, diagnosis, height, and growth rate). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Descriptive, longitudinal and retrospective study of children less than 14 years of age undergoing treatment with somatotropin administered with the Easypod® electronic device in the Paediatric Endocrinology Outpatient Clinic of the General University Hospital of Ciudad Real, Spain. Adherence was monitored for 12 months and was defined according to the equation: (days administered at the prescribed dose / prescribed days)×100. The data analysis was performed using SPSS software. RESULTS: Data were collected from 30 patients, with a predominance of males (57%), a mean age of 6.09 years, with 51% of children less than 5 years old. The most common reasons for the treatment were: small for gestational age (55%) and growth hormone deficiency (38%). The mean duration of treatment was 4.3 years (3.6-5). A mean adherence of 92.3% (87.7-96.9) was observed, and there was a significant correlation with age (Pearson R = -0.384, P=.03), and duration of treatment (Pearson R = -0.537; P=.003). CONCLUSIONS: The adherence in our patients with electronic device is high (92.3%), and is inversely associated with age and duration. The use of electronic devices allows monitoring of therapeutic compliance, which affects the optimisation of treatment.

Efficacy and safety of alendronic acid in the treatment of osteoporosis in children.

OBJECTIVES: to describe the efficacy and safety of the off-label use of alendronate in the treatment of osteoporosis in children and adolescents. METHOD: a retrospective study (2008-2014) of all patients under 18 years who were dispensed alendronate for this indication. The criteria for initiating treatment were: bone mineral density with a Z-score ≤ -2.5 SD, a past history of bone fractures without a previous traumatism, and persistent pain. The variables collected were: demographic, treatment-related, clinical. and safety data. The treatment was considered to be effective when there was an increase in bone mineral density up to a Z-score > -2.5 SD. RESULTS: a total of 12 patients, 8 of them male, with a mean age of 11 years (± 3 SD), were treated with alendronate. After a mean time of treatment of 2.15 years (± 1.2 SD), there was an increase in bone mineral density in all patients, 9 of which achieved a Z-score > -2.5 SD, so the drug was considered effective in 75% of cases. No patient had bone fractures or expressed adverse effects during treatment. CONCLUSIONS: alendronate increased bone mineral density and was well tolerated in all patients, therefore it could be considered as a therapeutic option in the treatment of osteoporosis in children.

Objetivos: describir la efectividad y seguridad del uso de acido alendronico en el tratamiento de la osteoporosis en ninos y adolescentes, en condiciones distintas a las autorizadas en la ficha tecnica. Métodos: estudio retrospectivo (2008-2014) de todos los pacientes menores de 18 anos a los que se dispenso acido alendronico para esta indicacion. Los criterios para iniciar tratamiento fueron: densidad mineral osea con puntuacion Z-score ≤ -2,5 DE, antecedentes de fracturas oseas sin traumatismo previo y dolor persistente. Las variables recogidas fueron: demograficas, de tratamiento, clinicas y de seguridad. Se considero efectividad del tratamiento al aumento de la densidad mineral osea hasta obtener Z-score > -2,5 DE. Resultados: un total de 12 pacientes, 8 varones, con una media de edad de 11 anos (} 3 DE), fueron tratados con acido alendronico. Tras un tiempo medio de tratamiento de 2,15 anos (} 1,2 DE), se produjo aumento de la densidad mineral osea en todos los pacientes, 9 de los cuales obtuvieron Z-score > -2,5 DE, por lo que el farmaco se considero efectivo en el 75% de los casos. Ningun paciente presento fracturas oseas ni manifesto efectos adversos durante el tratamiento. Conclusiones: el acido alendronico incremento la densidad mineral osea y se tolero bien en todos los pacientes, por lo que se podria considerar como opcion terapeutica en el tratamiento de la osteoporosis infantil.

Efficacy and safety of alendronic acid in the treatment of osteoporosis in children / Efectividad y seguridad del ácido alendrónico en el tratamiento de la osteoporosis infantil

Objectives: to describe the efficacy and safety of the off-label use of alendronate in the treatment of osteoporosis in children and adolescents. Method: a retrospective study (2008-2014) of all patients under 18 years who were dispensed alendronate for this indication. The criteria for initiating treatment were: bone mineral density with a Z-score ≤-2.5 SD, a past history of bone fractures without a previous traumatism, and persistent pain. The variables collected were: demographic, treatment-related, clinical. and safety data. The treatment was considered to be effective when there was an increase in bone mineral density up to a Z-score >-2.5 SD. Results: a total of 12 patients, 8 of them male, with a mean age of 11 years (± 3 SD), were treated with alendronate. After a mean time of treatment of 2.15 years (±1.2 SD), there was an increase in bone mineral density in all patients, 9 of which achieved a Z-score >-2.5 SD, so the drug was considered effective in 75% of cases. No patient had bone fractures or expressed adverse effects during treatment. Conclusions: alendronate increased bone mineral density and was well tolerated in all patients, therefore it could be considered as a therapeutic option in the treatment of osteoporosis in children (AU)

Objetivos: describir la efectividad y seguridad del uso de ácido alendrónico en el tratamiento de la osteoporosis en niños y adolescentes, en condiciones distintas a las autorizadas en la ficha técnica. Métodos: estudio retrospectivo (2008-2014) de todos los pacientes menores de 18 años a los que se dispensó ácido alendrónico para esta indicación. Los criterios para iniciar tratamiento fueron: densidad mineral ósea con puntuación Z-score ≤-2,5 DE, antecedentes de fracturas óseas sin traumatismo previo y dolor persistente. Las variables recogidas fueron: demográficas, de tratamiento, clínicas y de seguridad. Se consideró efectividad del tratamiento al aumento de la densidad mineral ósea hasta obtener Z-score >-2,5 DE. Resultados: un total de 12 pacientes, 8 varones, con una media de edad de 11 años (± 3 DE), fueron tratados con ácido alendrónico. Tras un tiempo medio de tratamiento de 2,15 años (± 1,2 DE), se produjo aumento de la densidad mineral ósea en todos los pacientes, 9 de los cuales obtuvieron Z-score >-2,5 DE, por lo que el fármaco se consideró efectivo en el 75% de los casos. Ningún paciente presentó fracturas óseas ni manifestó efectos adversos durante el tratamiento. Conclusiones: el ácido alendrónico incrementó la densidad mineral ósea y se toleró bien en todos los pacientes, por lo que se podría considerar como opción terapéutica en el tratamiento de la osteoporosis infantil (AU)